»{PracticePvP} Elo refund system

Hello!

So, many people get mad when they lose their elo on PracticePvP because of a hacker. I thought a PracticePvP system that gives you your elo back and (possibly) ban the person who made you lose it.

First of all, I would say to add a command /elor <Your name> <Others' name> and after you execute the command a message will pop up "Thanks for reporting! An admin will check your report as soon as possible!". Then the admin that will be online will get a message just like /h, but it says "Elo Refund: TheRealDoctor reported Thekillermatic for hacking". Then, same as /h, the administrator online will check out your report and if the person you reported is hacking, you will get your previous elo (before your fight with the hacker) + the elo you have won from the matches you have done during the period of time from your report to his ban.

If the player is not hacking, then the admin will execute a command like /elor deny <Player's name> <Reason>. For example, "/elor deny TheRealDoctor Player not online *OR* Player is not hacking".

Of course, admins will not always be online, so, another suggestion is to increase the number of admins on PracticePvP.

Abusing could be prevented with setting a limit to the reports ex. 5 reports every 24h, although you have a limited number of ranked matches.

This is my suggestion.I hope it's good enough so it will be added.
Tagging ppl to check it out
@Thekillermatic
@NinetyNine
@xph11

Thanks for reading!
Have a nice day

 

Indeed Your Idea Is Nice, But Admins Will Just see Like 100 People Every Day Want their Elo back..

 

yeah we need that in gc +1

 

It's a great idea, but the chat may be spammed with this. I think it will end up good, though!

 

this will be abused, bad idea for me.

 

I dont see how it can get abused its as easy as hacker kills you,lose elo then hacker gets banned get the elo back it wont add anything back like more than your elo before you fought the hacker

 

Bump? :3

 

If this helps in the process of cleaning up hackers I'm all for it.
Not exactly how this would work efficiency but it will be taken into consideration.

Thread closed //