»suggestions for factions hope you will like it <3

Discussion in 'Factions' started by ofek, Apr 14, 2019.

  1. Peta

    Peta Journeyman Member

    Messages:
    47
    Ratings:
    +5 / -0
    Yeet I agree on the first point. the entire reset has pretty much just been a 1v1 between the top 2 factions bearing half the people who play on GC in each lol.

    Reducing the number of players in a single faction would result in more factions as ofek said which would promote the much needed “competition” so many people are wanting, base building, raiding, pvp etc.

    On the topic of raiding, /Tnttoggle, /sand toggle, would definitely be a nice feature to have to reduce fps lag although

    @tomce1010 - I don’t see the need for a 2-4 second cannon rule - the fastest I’ve cannon I’ve seen used by someone is around 2 seconds which most servers allow not to mention if you try using anything faster than that, the cannon has a high chance of destroy itself. So Id say the server itself sets the limit.

    The current rule states that “Any cannon that potentially is lagging the server will be destroyed and/or removed” however the server has been holding up well since axed improved TNT. So far we have not had any issues with this.

    SO yeah I believe these suggestions mentioned above would help bring balance to factions

    Ye and it would be nice to have better printing.

    [EDIT]: We used to have f int, tnt bank, and tntfill raidius but I never liked using it as it wasn't really realiable at the time
     
    #21
  2. MrKalen

    MrKalen Journeyman Member

    Messages:
    40
    Ratings:
    +14 / -0
    You want more competivity with the first suggestion, but you truce all server to "try" to win us. And even if they make 15 man facs, all will ally to work together as a normal faction. So will be the same.
     
    #22
  3. Peta

    Peta Journeyman Member

    Messages:
    47
    Ratings:
    +5 / -0
    Well in that case there is the the 1 ally limit and remove truces suggestion. Although knowing NK, you guys will probably raid the other half of your faction at the end if player per fac gets reduced to 15 lol
     
    #23
  4. Charlotte007

    Charlotte007 Journeyman Member

    Messages:
    47
    Ratings:
    +2 / -0
    I agree on all
     
    #24
  5. MrKalen

    MrKalen Journeyman Member

    Messages:
    40
    Ratings:
    +14 / -0
    Really do you think that? We arent betrayers like you :)
     
    #25
  6. Peta

    Peta Journeyman Member

    Messages:
    47
    Ratings:
    +5 / -0
    -.- Dood NK faction enemied regicide last reset AND Loyalty this reset just to have some fun because they were bored without some competition; both were your allies and loyalty even helped to raid regicide this reset. Funny enough we ended up helping loyalty and now we've joined them. Tell me who's the betrayer neb ;p Don't get all cocky just I showed you how to place a line of cobble, water, slab, tnt, and a piston and called it a cannon. smh
     
    #26
  7. tomatonator2000

    tomatonator2000 Addict Member

    Messages:
    157
    Ratings:
    +32 / -0
    Peta yes we have enemied the factions above because we were bored. And what are allys, allys are just weird truce that will end any second. But faction is for life so we will not betray our (sister faction) we will help them gain f top 2 so there is a choice to be made here.
    1 . reduce the faction limit to 15 players and the ftop 1 and 2 will prob still be 1 faction so more f top price for that faction.
    2 . keep the 30 limit and have 1 f top price for 1 faction and then there is a chance for the smaller factions to win f top 2 or 3.
     
    #27
  8. Shailex

    Shailex Enthusiast Member

    Messages:
    134
    Ratings:
    +75 / -0
    If the player limit gets reduced to 15 we can then build 2 bases right beside each other and work together to claim ftop 1 and 2. We can also technically increase our buffers by putting "cannon boxes" with legal amounts of walls right in front of the base.
     
    #28
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. ofek

    ofek Enthusiast Member

    Messages:
    142
    Ratings:
    +27 / -0
    thats not allowed :) good luck doing it
     
    #29
  10. SemBedrock

    SemBedrock Faithful Poster Member

    Messages:
    671
    Ratings:
    +387 / -0
    I love you babe
     
    #30
  11. Frxq15

    Frxq15 kek Member

    Messages:
    4,841
    Ratings:
    +1,702 / -0
    What about me hoe
     
    #31
  12. SemBedrock

    SemBedrock Faithful Poster Member

    Messages:
    671
    Ratings:
    +387 / -0
    You were just a side thing I'm so sorry we can still be fwb
     
    #32
  13. Frxq15

    Frxq15 kek Member

    Messages:
    4,841
    Ratings:
    +1,702 / -0
    Wa da fuq man
     
    #33
  14. iOwnYou_

    iOwnYou_ Quick Digit Member

    Messages:
    275
    Ratings:
    +59 / -0
    hoeoeld
     
    #34
  15. mr_awesome2k12

    mr_awesome2k12 Faithful Poster Member

    Messages:
    616
    Ratings:
    +353 / -0
    Old players wont come back.
     
    #35
  16. SecrektPanda

    SecrektPanda Member Member

    Messages:
    65
    Ratings:
    +15 / -0
    Not a big fan of raid events, because 60% of the players doesn't know how to build a great cannon although I love the "team fights" and pvp idea! (Bring back igs on shop)
     
    #36
  17. imsopro120

    imsopro120 Member Member

    Messages:
    50
    Ratings:
    +10 / -0
    +1 on all
    No enderpearls at /warp pvp
     
    #37
  18. Dvali

    Dvali Newbie Member

    Messages:
    7
    Ratings:
    +0 / -0

    8. remove weekly .f top euro reward or make it for 2 or 3 week.
    9. remove roobles
    10. back ig spawners
    11. lower taxes for taking spawners
     
    #38
  19. ofek

    ofek Enthusiast Member

    Messages:
    142
    Ratings:
    +27 / -0
    they will probably lower it next reset
    it might get removed
    axed said it will break the eco
    agreed
     
    #39
  20. addokin

    addokin Newbie Member

    Messages:
    9
    Ratings:
    +0 / -0
    No ender pearls at warp pvp is a bad idea
     
    #40

Share This Page