»Suggestion For fourms

Discussion in 'Suggestions & Feedback' started by Sherif, Apr 11, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Sherif

    Sherif Forum Master Member

    Messages:
    1,772
    Ratings:
    +1,078 / -0
    Hello
    I would suggest to Divide the " Report " Section into Factions, Eggwars, Survival etc
    It would be easier for Both ( Staff and Players) Since people dont put Server Which they report on title

    @Rabascm @aXed @xph11 @AsyFrost

    Some people dont get it .

    IF There is Mod, Helper and Admins Who only in prison
    They dont need to open every singal post to see if its prison or not .

    This Will make hackers and Rule Breakers get Punishment fast
     
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2017
    #1
    • Disagree Disagree x 8
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. PresidentJTrump

    PresidentJTrump Enthusiast Member

    Messages:
    130
    Ratings:
    +47 / -0
    I disagree because the report format requires you to add what server you want to report on. It will be a bit harder if we sorted it because of clicking too much website to website just to see the report.
     
    #2
    • Agree Agree x 3
  3. yousiftdm0770

    yousiftdm0770 Honorary Poster Member

    Messages:
    463
    Ratings:
    +273 / -0
    I disagree because that^
     
    #3
  4. Itsfoxxy

    Itsfoxxy Member Member

    Messages:
    71
    Ratings:
    +102 / -0
    that is a nice idea
    +1
     
    #4
  5. 1234abc1234

    1234abc1234 Journeyman Member

    Messages:
    27
    Ratings:
    +4 / -0
    I agree the suggestion:)
    Reporter can skip the step of reporting in which server, and staff don't need to watch which server the player report, it can save some time.
     
    #5
  6. Wizare

    Wizare Ancient Poster Member

    Messages:
    765
    Ratings:
    +237 / -0
    I don't see why many people disagree with this.
    It seems pretty useful to me as many staff members who are assigned for a certain server will only view the threads on the server topic for which they're assigned.
    +1
     
    #6
  7. CyberHazard

    CyberHazard Forum Master Member

    Messages:
    1,812
    Ratings:
    +1,317 / -0
    No.
     
    #7
  8. Sherif

    Sherif Forum Master Member

    Messages:
    1,772
    Ratings:
    +1,078 / -0
    Some people dont get it .

    IF There is Mod, Helper and Admins Who only in prison
    They dont need to open every singal post to see if its prison or not .

    This Will make hackers and Rule Breakers get Punishment fast
     
    #8
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  9. CyberHazard

    CyberHazard Forum Master Member

    Messages:
    1,812
    Ratings:
    +1,317 / -0
    Okay, I'll tell you why I disagree with this when I get on my computer.

    I have an better idea. Probs going to make a thread later
     
    #9
  10. PresidentJTrump

    PresidentJTrump Enthusiast Member

    Messages:
    130
    Ratings:
    +47 / -0
    That's where you're wrong. Mr. KingCraft. They should open every single post so they can solve the problems of the other reports before they can do the prison report. It may not be fast but more players can be punished. You would not be in a hurry just to punish 1 person.
     
    #10
  11. AsyFrost

    AsyFrost Eh Hai Member

    Messages:
    1,410
    Ratings:
    +1,280 / -0
    It is a good and a bad idea at the same time.

    Good; It's structural and would theoretically improve the quality of threads/posts.
    Bad; It will limit many staff members looking at reports, most of the times reports can be dealt with or resolved by active staff and doesn't in particular require a server sided staff member to take care of it. Dividing everything into sub-server forums will make it more navigating. Time and quantity isn't a huge luxury here as a staff member.

    Unfortunately the bad out weights the good in this moment of time so your suggestion will not go through.

    Thank you however for suggesting and thinking how we can improve things, it's very appreciated.
     
    #11
    • Agree Agree x 1
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page